Industry Specification for Unwanted Tracking: Apple and Google Lead the Way


Apple and Google have announced new policies establishing principles governing data collection and usage on their platforms. These industry specifications aim to constrain unwanted tracking within reasonable and ethical bounds enabling innovation that benefits users rather than exploits them. By providing oversight and guardrails for development, leading tech companies can help shape a future where technology progresses responsibly rather than manipulatively. 


The Need for Industry Specification for Unwanted Tracking


Unwanted tracking of user data and behaviour poses privacy concerns that demand attention through policy, legislation and responsible practices. However, general laws alone cannot effectively solve complex data collection and use issues. Regulations must be supplemented with enforceable standards developed by experts within specific industries.


Industries collecting and utilizing large amounts of user data are responsible for implementing policies limiting unwanted tracking and ensuring transparency of practices. Self-regulation allows tailoring guidelines to innovative business models and technologies that evolve rapidly. Commitments can be reinforced through independent audits, certification programs and consequences when violations occur.


Focused workgroups within industries are best equipped to evaluate how data is gathered and applied within their sectors. They can determine what information is reasonably required to provide services while restricting excessive collection and speculation. Granular guidelines will improve oversight and accountability across fragmented companies, applications, devices and data sources.


Users cannot know or control how their data travels between entities in sprawling digital ecosystems. They should not have to navigate mazes of obscure privacy policies to exercise fundamental rights over their information. Requirements for limiting data usage, storage timeframes, sharing restrictions and opt-out options can bring clarity when accessing services.


There is value in data that fuels innovation and progress when handled responsibly. Specifications limiting unwanted tracking would not impede the benefits of informational capitalism but curb excesses that compromise individual well-being and trust in the system. Policies should aim to facilitate data-driven gains through transparent and consensual collection and application of information.


In summary, broad laws and regulations alone are insufficient for addressing privacy concerns over unwanted tracking of user data. Industry-established guidelines are necessary to develop balanced and tailored policies based on nuanced business models and technologies.


The Initiative Led by Apple and Google for Unwanted Tracking


Tech giants Apple and Google recently announced plans to curb unwanted tracking of user data and limit spread to third parties. The initiative aims to strengthen privacy while enabling useful advertising and analytics applications. Changes will provide more controls, transparency, and restrictions on sharing information across apps and devices.


The move is a positive step towards responsibility, but limitations are unlikely to satisfy advocates calling for stronger privacy laws and regulations. Policies developed by companies also depend on trust in their judgment and altruism, despite business models relying on data and advertising. There are valid concerns the initiative may disproportionately impact smaller companies while allowing the most significant players to maintain advantages through access to information.


Guidance must strike a balance between transparency, consent and innovation to be pretty and widely adopted. Users want control over their data without surrendering the benefits of free services or capabilities emerging from research. Policies must facilitate reasonable usage and limits, not prohibition. Transparency tools should inform choices instead of obscuring how information strengthens capabilities.


Arguments against regulation ignore how market forces have failed to curb excesses thus far. Voluntary policies alone will not counter the incentive for companies to gather more data and monitor more behaviour when more is increasingly possible and profitable. Laws establishing guardrails and accountability are likely necessary to protect individuals from predatory practices under the guise of usefulness and consent.

Still, any laws or regulations should not impede progress and must consider complex relationships between companies, users, data, and services in the digital economy. Nuanced policies require understanding the multifaceted issues, not ideological extremes. Dialogue and compromise, not criticism and threats, will yield solutions that balance privacy and prosperity.


The Goals of the Industry Specification for Unwanted Tracking


Guidance developed by experts within specific industries aims to establish balanced and pragmatic standards for limiting unwanted tracking of user data. Policies should facilitate transparency, accountability and consent around the collection and use of information while still enabling innovation and benefits of data-driven technologies.


Specifications determine what data is reasonably required for services versus excessively gathered for speculation or surveillance. They would align oversight between fragmented companies, complex systems and evolving practices. Requirements around limiting storage timeframes, restricting sharing across entities, opt-out options and requesting affirmative consent can empower users in complex digital ecosystems.


Targets for standards include granular controls, audits, certification and consequences that motivate responsible practices. Self-regulation allows tailoring guidelines to diverse business models, technologies and reasonable usage within industries. Policies can reinforce innovative gains from data while curbing excesses compromising individual well-being or trust in systems.


The goals of industry specifications are not prohibition or dismantling of data-driven progress. They aim to facilitate advancement through ethics and trust instead of exploitation. Policies should simplify informing choices rather than obscuring how information benefits companies and customers. Transparency tools increase understanding and consent, not exposure and vulnerability.


Standards establish guardrails enabling innovation to flourish within accountability and responsibility. They counter incentives for excessive collection and monitoring when more data and surveillance are possible and profitable. Specifications can ensure data strengthens society, not just through profit or control. Policies should value data-enhancing lives, not just exploit them for gain.


Industry guidelines aim to develop nuanced policies considering complex relationships between companies, users, data, services and progress. They rely on balanced, multi-stakeholder input rather than ideological extremes. Policies must balance meaningful privacy, ethics and consent with opportunities emerging from the information. Comprehensive solutions depend on facilitating benefit and limiting harm, not prohibition or ignorance.


The Scope of the Industry Specification for Unwanted Tracking


Guidelines developed by industry experts aim to establish practical standards limiting the unwanted collection and use of user data across divergent business models, technologies and services. Policies must have scope and flexibility to suit innovative practices that evolve rapidly within complex digital ecosystems.

Specifications determine reasonable data usage for specific purposes versus excess gathering for speculation or surveillance. They align oversight between fragmented companies, applications, devices, data sources and sharing between entities. Requirements around transparency, consent, data minimization, purpose limitation and opt-out options can empower users navigating maze-like systems.

The scope of standards encompasses granular controls, audits, certification and penalties motivating responsible practices. Self-regulation allows tailoring policies to diverse, evolving needs within industries. Consistent guidelines reinforce ethical innovation while curbing excesses undermining trust or well-being. Policies value progress benefiting all, not just profit or control.

Standards establish balanced guardrails enabling progress to flourish within the bounds of accountability. They counter incentives for overcollection and excessive monitoring possible with advancing technologies. Specifications ensure data strengthens society, not just through commercial exploitation. Policies should facilitate benefit, not just profit or surveillance.

Guidelines develop nuanced, multi-stakeholder solutions considering complex relationships between key stakeholders and progress. They rely on compromise and partnership over criticism or grievance. Policies balance meaningful privacy and oversight with opportunities emerging from the information. Comprehensive progress depends on facilitating benefits and limiting harm together.

The scope of industry specifications aims to protect and empower through governance, not dismantling progress globally crucial systems. Policies value innovative benefits and well-being, not just profit. Standards determine what data usage is reasonably required versus excessively gathered and shared, aligning fragmented oversight mechanisms. Requirements can give users informed choices and controls, not obscurity or exposure. Transparency tools increase understanding, consent and partnership rather than distrust or vulnerability.


The Technical Details of the Industry Specification for Unwanted Tracking


Guidelines developed by industry experts determine reasonable data collection and use versus excess for technical policies. Requirements specify purposes and timeframes for storing and sharing information while enabling essential applications. They define limits, consent options and opt-out controls.


Specifications consider how data benefits services and users, not just commercial exploitation. Policies allow innovation to thrive through ethics and partnership rather than unrestrained capability. Technical details facilitate progress aligned with principles of transparency, consent and responsibility rather than disregarding them.


Technical policies develop nuanced solutions balancing meaningful privacy oversight with opportunities fueling continued advancement. They rely on compromise and integrated progress over criticism or prohibition. Requirements determine what data usage is reasonably necessary versus excessively gathered or shared across complex systems and stakeholders.
Technical guidelines leverage expertise establishing proportionate practices for diverse business models, technologies and reasonable usage within industries. Policies can reinforce ethical innovation tailored to evolving needs rather than one-size-fits-all mandates. Consistent standards motivate responsible information management through transparency, choice and consequences rather than disregard.


Technical specifications consider complex relationships between companies, users, data, services, applications, devices, and sharing mechanisms. They aim for balanced policies and oversight rather than absolutes or isolationism. Multi-stakeholder participation develops integrated solutions rather than siloed perspectives. Policies determine oversight aligning responsibility and capability.


Requirements around data minimization, purpose limitation, storage limits, sharing restrictions and opt-out controls empower users to navigate interconnected systems. Policies make informed choices simpler rather than mandate exposure or obscurity. Transparency tools increase understanding to strengthen partnerships rather than undermine trust.


Overall, technical guidelines develop balanced policies enabling both privacy oversight and progress. They establish proportionate safeguards through transparency, consent, data minimization and accountability rather than dismantling globally essential systems and capabilities. Policies value partnership, ethics and benefit over unrestrained exploitation.


The Role of Privacy in the Industry Specification for Unwanted Tracking


Industry standards aim to establish balanced policies enabling oversight governance and progress rather than absolutism, exploitation or dismantling of globally essential systems.


Specifications determine reasonable data usage aligned with transparency, consent and responsibility principles rather than disregarding them. Policies value partnership, ethics and the benefit of all rather than commercial interests. They develop nuanced solutions considering complex relationships rather than criticism or prohibition. Policies balance meaningful privacy oversight with opportunities fueling continued advancement.


Guidelines establish proportionate safeguards enabling innovation to thrive through trust and ethics rather than threats or disregard for individual well-being. Policies allow critical applications benefiting society rather than just profit. They specify storage limits, sharing restrictions, opt-out controls and consent choices, empowering users to navigate interconnected systems. Policies deliver informed selection through partnership rather than obscurity, exposure or manipulation. Transparency builds trust enabling sustainable progress.


Privacy aims to benefit through protection and empowerment, not punishment. Governance should aim for just, inclusive and comprehensive benefits by facilitation rather than exploitation or control alone. Policies determine reasonable oversight aligning responsibility and capability. Progress depends on balanced, nuanced solutions rather than rhetoric or extremes alone.
Requirements motivate responsible data management through consequences and accountability rather than disregard. They consider complex relationships between companies, data, services, applications, devices, users and sharing mechanisms. Policies aim for integrated governance rather than isolationism. Multi-stakeholder participation develops compromise enabling comprehensive progress rather than criticism or prohibition.
Overall, industry specifications determine reasonable data usage aligning capability and responsibility. Policies allow critical applications benefiting society rather than threats to liberty, trust or manipulation. Requirements specify storage limits, sharing restrictions, opt-out controls and consent empowering users navigating systems. Policies deliver informed choice through partnership rather than obscurity or exposure. Transparency builds trust enabling ethical innovation.


The Benefits of the Industry Specification for Users


Here are the key benefits of industry specifications for users:

  • Empowered choice– Requirements around transparency, consent options, and opt-out controls inform users of how their data and information are used rather than obscurity or manipulation.
  • Proportional governance– Policies determine reasonable data usage versus excess for specific purposes rather than broad surveillance or disregard of privacy. Guidelines establish guardrails enabling innovation to progress within ethical bounds.
  • Balanced policies- Nuanced solutions consider complex relationships rather than criticism or prohibition alone. Multi-stakeholder input develops compromise enabling comprehensive progress rather than isolated perspectives or extreme positions. Policies create opportunity, oversight and privacy rather than sacrificing for others.
  • Trusted partnership– Transparency builds understanding and consent rather than distrust in systems users depend on and value. 
  • Inclusive benefit- Policies aim for justice, shared prosperity and comprehensive progress benefiting all society rather than profit, politics or narrow self-interest alone. There are safeguards against exploitation, enabling opportunities for diverse groups and communities, not just commercial interests.
  • Reasonable requirements. Specifications determine limits, storage restrictions, sharing constraints and controls, and aligning responsibility and capability rather than absolutes alone. Policies allow critical applications to benefit users rather than threats to utility, access or manipulation.
  • Multifaceted solutions- Nuanced guidelines consider complex relationships between companies, data, services, applications, devices and sharing mechanisms. They aim for integrated governance rather than isolated policymaking alone. Comprehensive solutions balance diverse priorities rather than single issues.
  • Fair and ethical progress- Policies value partnership, integrity, consent and shared benefit over manipulation, threats, disregard or control alone. Advancement depends on principled approaches facilitating justice, inclusion and comprehensive well-being for the long term – not quick gains, politics or profit alone. Progress sustainable and ethical relies on balanced governance and nuanced policymaking rather than extremes alone.


The Benefits of the Industry Specification for Businesses


Key benefits of industry specifications for businesses are as follows:

  • Aligned innovation- Policies determine reasonable oversight motivating moral progress aligned with privacy, trust and responsibility principles. They establish guardrails enabling continued advancement within bounds of accountability rather than threats. Innovation thrives through partnership rather than manipulation or disregard of impact.
  • Balanced policies– Nuanced solutions consider complex relationships between companies, data, services and systems rather than isolationism. Multi-stakeholder input develops compromise enabling comprehensive progress rather than siloed perspectives. 
  • Credible oversight- Specifications motivate responsible data management through accountability and consequences of irresponsible practices rather than lack of principles or constraints alone. They establish what usage is reasonably required versus excessively gathered or shared. Policies consider how information benefits services and users, not just commercial interests.
  • Multifaceted governance– Policies determine limits, storage restrictions, sharing controls and consent options, giving companies informed practices rather than disregarding privacy, responsibility or trust. Comprehensive solutions balance various priorities rather than reducing innovation to a single issue.
  • Inclusive benefit– Policies aim for justice, shared prosperity and comprehensive progress benefiting all society rather than profit, politics or dominance over other interests alone. There are safeguards against exploitation ensuring opportunity and benefit extend to diverse groups, not just those with power or means.
  • Reasonable requirements- Industry guidelines determine proportionate policies rather than absolutes or lack of oversight alone. There are limitations of what is reasonably required to operate services versus excess gathering possible without any guardrails. Policies allow critical applications to benefit companies and users rather than manipulation, threats or disregard of impact.


Want to Know More about Google and Apple Initiative

Read our Newsletter now


The Future of Unwanted Tracking


Unwanted tracking continues evolving with advancing technology, necessitating improved governance. Industry specifications aim to establish balanced policies enabling innovation and oversight together rather than threats against privacy, responsibility or progress alone.


Nuanced solutions consider relationships between companies, data, services and systems rather than isolationism. Multi-stakeholder input develops compromise enabling comprehensive progress rather than single-issue absolutism. Policies balance opportunity and ethics rather than allowing excess or threatening innovation.


Policies establish proportionate constraints rather than a lack of principles or absolutes. Requirements determine reasonable data usage aligned with responsibility rather than disregard impact. There are limitations ensuring the utility of services rather than manipulation or invasion of trust. Policies value partnership over threats and shared benefit over-exploitation.


Transparency builds understanding through consent and consideration of how systems affect lives – not obscurity, manipulation or fearmongering. Policies deliver informed practices rather than a lack of oversight. Partnership shapes governance enabling benefit for all rather than capturing resources for a few alone.


Guidelines aim for justice, inclusion and prosperity, benefiting society rather than profit, politics or control alone. Accountability and consequences motivate responsible innovation rather than a lack of guiding principles. Policies consider how information and technology can benefit diverse groups, not just commercial interests or those in power alone.


Specifications determine aligned innovation, enabling significant progress and ethical oversight together – not threats against ethics or progression. Policies establish guardrails facilitating advancement within responsible bounds rather than the absence of constraints enabling manipulation alone. Nuanced governance allows meaningful opportunities rather than prohibiting innovation altogether or enabling its misuse.


The Role of Users in Addressing Unwanted Tracking


Users stand to benefit from and contribute to solutions addressing unwanted tracking. By understanding evolving technologies, policies and their rights, individuals can advocate for balanced governance, ensuring progress aligns with privacy principles, trust and responsibility.

Users can participate in developing nuanced, multifaceted policies considering complex relationships rather than particular issues alone. Multi-stakeholder collaboration finds compromise enabling innovation and oversight together rather than threats against progress or privacy. Policies value partnership over disregarding well-being and shared benefits over-exploitation of data or trust.


Users speak up about concerns with data collection, use and sharing to shape nuanced rather than absolutist solutions. They consider how services positively contribute to lives and potential misuse if ungoverned. By expressing perspectives on benefits and risks, users help determine reasonable constraints aligning capability and ethics. Policies establish guardrails enabling opportunity rather than prohibiting progress altogether or enabling manipulation alone.


Educating others on issues like unwanted tracking and available solutions helps build understanding across society. When more people comprehend related technologies, policies and rights, it facilitates partnership over polarization and balances over threats alone defining governance. Comprehensive progress depends on considering the impact on all rather than rhetoric or empty promises alone.


Users insist on and implement principles of privacy, consent and transparency, bringing more ethical practice. Individuals can make informed choices about data sharing and usage by understanding how systems work and available controls like opt-outs or data access/deletion requests. Policies aim for and build trust by considering the effect on lives rather than obscurity, manipulation or fear alone.




Though policies alone do not guarantee just outcomes, they represent a crucial first step. As technology advances, companies establishing principles of privacy, partnership and balance are needed to motivate oversight, enabling benefit rather than detriment alone defining progress. When implemented and enforced equitably, guidelines from leaders in the industry can help build a foundation of trust on which future progress depends. 


Overall, Apple and Google leading the way on unwanted tracking through balanced rules provide a reason to hope governance can determine limits aligning ethics and potential together rather than threats against either alone defining the path ahead.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)


What to do if an unwanted AirTag is tracking you?


  • Locate the AirTag using the Find My app on your iPhone, iPad or Mac and tap Play Sound to make it alert so you can find it.
  • Hold down the AirTag for at least 10 seconds until the status indicator light starts flashing continuously. It disables the AirTag and prevents it from tracking you further.
  • Report unwanted tracking to local authorities like the police. They may use GPS data to determine who placed the AirTag.


How can I tell if an AirTag is tracking me?


  • Check for unknown devices in the Find My app. AirTags will appear as “Item” with their specific ID number.
  • Look for small devices attached to your belongings, vehicle or belongings. AirTags are about the size of a coin with a metallic finish and a button on one side.
  • If an unknown device is making a noise like beeping or a chime, it could indicate an AirTag is tracking you. AirTags will play a sound to help locate them if they get lost.


How do AirTags work?


  • AirTags use Bluetooth and ultra-wideband technology to track the location of your belongings. They connect to Apple devices like iPhones, which determine the AirTag’s location relative to Wi-Fi and GPS locations.
  • When an AirTag moves out of the Bluetooth range of your devices, its location is determined using the locations of other nearby iPhones. This crowdsourced data helps build up the AirTag’s location over time as more people walk by it.


How do I turn off tracking on my iPhone?


  • Go to Settings → Privacy → Tracking and toggle off “Allow Apps to Request to Track”. It prevents third-party apps from tracking your location and activity across apps and websites.
  • Go to Settings → Location Services and toggle off individual apps to prevent them from accessing your location data. Or toggle off “Enable Location Services” to disable location tracking on your iPhone.
  • Go to Settings → General → Reset and tap “Reset Network Settings” to clear out network information and prioritize currently available Wi-Fi networks over previously connected ones. It can help prevent unknown devices from accessing your network.
  • Consider using a VPN or private browsing mode to block network tracking of your activity and location. Some free or paid VPN services can help prevent unwanted monitoring.
  • You can also use third-party apps that claim to prevent tracking, though they cannot guarantee complete anonymity. The most secure approach is limiting what data you share whenever possible.